Evening Walk-Through, St. Regis Hotel, Beijing, China - July 18, 2007
Remarks
by Christopher R. Hill
Assistant
Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs
Evening
Walk-Through, St. Regis Hotel
Beijing,
China
July
18, 2007
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: Hello, I’m the warm up act for Sasae, who should be
coming here shortly.
QUESTION:
(Inaudible)
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: I think today we just began what I think will be a two-day
meeting. I think the plan is to conclude it tomorrow. I don’t
believe it will go through to Friday. I think we all continue to
have a lot of bilateral discussions. But we did have a lengthy, I
think, two and a half hour head of delegation meeting that followed a
lunch that was also set up. I think the meeting went according to
plan. That is, we discussed a number of issues, including a sort of
work plan for the period ahead. We discussed getting the working
groups together. We discussed some of the technical issues of
sequencing the elements of the next phase -- namely, especially, the
issue of the fuel oil. Because the DPRK capacity per month for fuel
oil is something like 50,000 tons and the amount of fuel oil is
something like 950,000, so if you just do that on a month-by-month
basis that is too many months. So there was some discussion about
things like that.
But I think the main
point is all this will be kicked through the working group. And we
discussed an overall target timeframe where we try to get done with
these phase two issues. So, overall, a very good discussion. I
think we will continue it tomorrow. We’ll probably wrap it up
tomorrow afternoon with a Chairman’s statement.
QUESTION: Mr.
Hill, the February agreement had five steps -- 50,000 tons of fuel
being one of them, a list of all nuclear programs including plutonium
extraction –
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: Discussions of a list, yes.
QUESTION:
Discussion of a list, and also the Trading With the Enemy Act.
Has that first step been completed already?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: Yes, we assessed that they are done. We had some
discussion on what the declaration would be, what the list would be
for the declaration. I think it was agreed that will continue as
they begin to produce the list -- I’m sorry, as they produce
the declaration. But we need to have a sort of working agreement on
when the declaration would be produced, when the disablement would be
accomplished.
We’ve always
thought doing the declaration should come before simply because we
need to know what needs to be disabled. So you should first have a
list and a declaration before actually disabling. But, again, we
don’t want to put ourselves on a narrow path where one element
depends on the other.
So I think we assessed
that our previous first stage undertakings have largely been
completed. I think the remaining fuel oil will be shipped, of the
remaining 50,000 tons, will be shipped to the DPRK at the very
beginning of August. So I think we are basically done on that.
I think what we really
need to focus on is this issue of the declaration, the disablement,
and the fuel oil. There are some bilateral considerations, and those
have to continue to be worked. We were under the obligation in the
initial February agreement to begin the process. We’ve
certainly done that, and we will be continuing that process as we go
into this next phase.
QUESTION:
Ambassador, you agreed to the target time frames?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: I would say we had a good discussion on it. But why don’t
you stay tuned for the Chairman’s statement. I don’t
want to reveal all the elements that our Chairman will be addressing
in his statement, probably sometime tomorrow.
QUESTION: Mr.
Chun apparently said that Mr. Kim told him that they are going to
provide all of the list and they are willing to disable in the coming
five, six months. Can you confirm that?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: Again, I don’t want to get into too many specifics
on that, except to say there was a very good and positive discussion
on all of these issues. And I think the mood was very business-like,
very forward-looking, because of the fact that the first phase
elements -- albeit a little late -- but nonetheless were getting
done.
QUESTION: Was
there any opposition to your idea of a deadline? Or to end the
second phase by the end of year?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: We talked about a sort of target phase. And, again, I
think that will be reflected in the Chairman’s statement. So I
-- Again, I’d rather not tell you what is in the Chairman’s
statement. Then you won’t buy a copy when it comes out
tomorrow [laughter].
QUESTION: Do
you already have a draft statement?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: No, no. I think the Chairman will probably do one
tomorrow. But today was a very substantive discussion. We will
probably have another one tomorrow, when I think we meet in the
morning around 10 o’clock. So I think the Chairman’s
statement will reflect the conversation today and the conversation
tomorrow, and I’m sure it will get written sometime in the
afternoon.
QUESTION:
Ambassador, you said one of the things you were trying to do was sort
of get a timeframe for a declaration, and you were looking at –
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: An overall timeframe for the completion of phase two.
QUESTION: And
also you wanted a timeframe when the declaration would come from the
North Koreans. Were you able to make progress on that?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: I think we made progress, but I think what you’ll
see tomorrow is that we’ve got an overall schedule or target
date for completing second phase actions
QUESTION: Are
there certain things the North Koreans want to see before they submit
a declaration?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: Yes, because we have to work out the sequencing of those
elements. But what we want to do is have an agreement on a target
date by which time all the elements would be completed. All the
elements of the second phase would be completed so we can get on with
the next phase. So, again, I think these have been very positive
discussions on this.
QUESTION: What
is the main element that you are working on now? What is the
sequence that you need to achieve, let’s say, by the end of the
year? What do you want to achieve by the end of the year?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: OK, I’ll repeat it for the hundredth time. OK?
First element is declaration of all nuclear programs. Then, second
element on the DPRK side would be, we want to disable their nuclear
program. Part of disablement would be, for example, to make the
reactor at Yongban not able to work. But you need a lot of technical
people to look at the question of how you disable. There are a lot
of different ways to do that. Do you disable in a way that makes it
impossible to be brought back, difficult to be brought back, easy to
be brought back? So we have to work out a lot of details there, and
we are not there yet.
The next element is the
heavy fuel oil, which is some 950,000 tons, and that has to be
brought into the equation in a way that it is not all back-loaded.
That is, we don’t have a situation where the North Koreans have
done everything they are supposed to do for the promise of fuel oil
to come. So somehow working with the fact that they can only bring
in about 50,000 a month, we probably want to look at some fuel oil
equivalents. For example, you can -- instead of having fuel oil --
you could have some type of refurbishment of a plant, or increase
their storage capacity, or provide some electricity ,or something
like that. It needs to be worked out.
Now what I am pointing
to here is that in the case of disablement and declaration -- or
declaration and disablement -- there are a lot of technical issues
still to be addressed. That is why it is very important we have a
working group – the denuclearization working group needs to
address some of these. On the fuel oil side we need an energy
working group to address that, because probably we’ll be
looking at some fuel oil equivalents of the kind I just mentioned.
So on our side, there
will also be some bilateral considerations. In the September
agreement, for example, we agreed to begin the process of removing
them from the list of state sponsored terrorism. So we have to see
how that process of beginning the process, how that will continue and
how that would be addressed. So that also requires a working group
that is a bilateral working group to further address that.
So we have a lot of
work ahead of us. But our plan is to see all of the elements that
I’ve just mentioned to you -- that is, declaration,
disablement, fuel oil and bilateral issues -- all be addressed in a
certain time frame, a target time frame that the parties would agree
to.
Do I have it all? You
got that all?
QUESTION: Do
the North Koreans have a plan to disable by the end of the year?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: Again, we’re in the middle of the discussion. Let’s
talk about it when the discussion’s over.
QUESTION: About
the working groups’ schedule, did you all agree to something by
next month?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: We agreed to get going on the working groups and get a
schedule for them, and after tomorrow I’m sure I can be more
specific about that.
QUESTION: There
have been reports that the North Koreans are refusing to talk to the
Japanese in bilaterals. Can you confirm that?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: I certainly cannot confirm that. No, I cannot.
QUESTION: Mr.
Hill what is the minimum that has to be achieved before the foreign
ministers will agree to meet, from your point of view?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: Well, I think we still have to have further discussion
about what we want to see in the ministerial. I think everyone
agreed to meet, to be well-prepared. We agreed we will probably need
a draft ministerial statement.
Can I just clean my
glasses without being photographed? Thank you. [laughter]
So I think we will need
to work through that, and probably tomorrow morning --
QUESTION: Do
you need a declaration before the foreign ministers will meet?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: No, we need a reason for them to meet, and I think we can
come up with something.
QUESTION: Are
you going to be encouraging the Japanese to soften their stance on
the abduction issue? Encourage them to participate in the fuel and
financial aid?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: I think the mood around the table was pretty positive
today. I don’t think anyone needs any pep talk about anything.
I think what they need to do, what we all need to do, is get on with
our working groups and figure out how we can schedule all five
working groups and do it in a time of year when a lot of the people
won’t be on vacation.
QUESTION: You
mentioned a couple of times there may be some flexibility on the
declaration. Can you tell us what sort of flexibility you have in
mind?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: What do you mean flexibility on the declaration?
QUESTION: I
heard you say there may be some flexibility on form or timing aspects
of the declaration.
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: That was not coming from me. I think we need a complete
declaration. It’s very important that all means all. So in
anticipation of your next question, yes, we need the uranium issue
addressed in that.
QUESTION: Did
that come up in discussion today?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: Lots of things came up in discussions today.
QUESTION: Take
us through your day today. You had a bilateral with the Chinese to
start. How is that different from what transpired during the heads
of delegation meeting? Did you have any other bilaterals?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: I think, starting yesterday, I said the same things five,
six times actually. I’ve had bilaterals with each of the five
participants, and then we had a two-and-a-half-hour heads of
delegation meeting. And I think there was a lot of agreement around
the table about what needs to be done in this phase.
But before one writes
about my being optimistic or something, we’re talking about
this phase. There has to be a follow-on phase and probably an even
more important phase, and that is the actual abandonment of the
actual fissile material and the explosive devices on the DPRK side.
And that’s very important. But with respect to this phase, of
the elements that I just outlined to you, it was a very good
discussion. But in terms of my day-to-day, it was a lot of bilateral
discussions during the course of the day. But the main discussion
being with the two-and-a-half hour meeting with the heads of
delegation.
QUESTION: Any
meetings tonight?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: You know, I don’t think I do. Maybe down the
corridor a bit, but that’s about it.
QUESTION:
What’s your schedule like tomorrow?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: I think we start at 10 o’clock. I think there’s
a plan that we’ll meet some senior people from the Foreign
Ministry, and I think there is a dinner tomorrow night.
QUESTION: No
bilateral in the morning?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: We don’t have a plan right now to have a bilat
before the 10 o’clock head of delegation meeting. So I will
probably go to the Embassy, and I’ll let you know when I walk
by here.
QUESTION: Do
you think DPRK are willing to include nuclear explosive devices in
their declaration?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: Good question. We’re going to have to keep talking
about that. Again those are very important details, and that goes to
the question of a complete declaration. At this point I can’t
answer your question, except that the issue has been raised.
QUESTION: What
is your impression from Mr. Kim Gye Gwan about (inaudible)?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: I’m sorry? Oh I don’t have impressions. I
just have observations. It was a very business-like meeting.
Probably in terms of how businesslike and how non-polemical it was,
this was all about getting through the agenda that we’ve set.
In that sense I would say it was a very useful Six-Party meeting
today.
QUESTION:
You’ve said that you still need to discuss whether nuclear
weapons are included in the --
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: Wait, wait, let me just explain. You have fissile
material, then you have explosive devices – bombs – in
which the fissile material is located. So that clearly has to be in
a declaration. Now the problem you get into is counting delivery
systems that have not been tested as delivery systems, and it does
get very technical, and it needs to be discussed in the
denuclearization working group.
QUESTION: Is
there some flexibility before the whole declaration takes place?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: No, you just have to have some technical discussions
before the declaration takes place. We need a lot more technical
discussions than we have had today, but all of these issues have been
discussed. So I don’t think you’ll see any problem of
people being greeted with unpleasant surprises.
QUESTION: Will
Beijing be the venue for technical discussions?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: I think I’m not sure it needs to be every time. But
I think some of these working groups may be held outside Beijing. So
you’ll be able to take a break when that happens. But probably
some of them will be here, and that has not been worked out. I think
we also want to get dates, because it’s tough getting everyone
around a table in August.
QUESTION: Just
to clarify. In tomorrow’s chairman’s statement, is it
going to be a hard timeline you think will be coming out, or is it
more of a broad framework?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: I think it’s more of a broad framework. But we are
going to have to sit down in a Six-Party meeting, not just head of
delegation, and work out very precise benchmarks, and we have not
done that yet. But we want to get a concept of the overall
timeframe. I think it takes a little time. But we are on the right
track for that.
QUESTION: Before
the technical issues, do you think North Korea understands the need
to include fissile material that is in tested devices in their
declaration?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: I think that they do. They understand that.
QUESTION: Did
you ask them directly? Can you confirm?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: I don’t want to tell you every bit of our
conversation. Otherwise I’d just invite you to the meeting.
We’re not avoiding any topics. We’re having very open
and substantive discussions about this . But I don’t want to
tell you what they say or what I say, because that takes all the fun
out of it. I know it’s your job to ask, but it’s my job
to say no. [laughter]
We will continue to
work on it. I think what’s important in these things is you
want to be very clear what you need so that there won’t be any
surprises when you get to the actual day when you’re trying to
negotiate it with very specific benchmarks and things like that.
We’re making progress on that.
QUESTION: I
know you wanted to get some information from the Chinese delegation.
What have you got from the Chinese delegation?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: I wanted to talk to them about their concept of what to do
in this meeting, how they see the timelines coming up. And so I had
a lengthy bilateral with them this morning. And I’m very
pleased that the various telephoning we have done in the last few
weeks, our embassies conveying messages -- it’s worked, and
there were not any surprises on our expectations. When I talked to
the Chinese, I realized we were all essentially on the same sheet of
music in terms of what the agenda would be.
QUESTION: What
kind of concept would they say?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: I just answered your question. I can’t do it again.
QUESTION: Was
there any discussion today on a permanent peace agreement on the
Korean Peninsula?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: We had some discussion about the about the peace regime.
I certainly gave my view that I think it is something we are looking
for after we have denuclearization moving ahead.
QUESTION: Not
completed? Just moving?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: Not completed, because a peace process on the Korean
Peninsula needs to be done after, certainly not before, there is
denuclearization. A peace process on the Korean Peninsula would have
to be done on a kind of parallel basis with the Six-Party process
continuing its primary job of denuclearization. We had a little
discussion about that. But, again, it is among relevant parties. So
we tend not to talk about it so much in a Six-Party plenary, for
example. But I think everyone sees it as something that comes
certainly not immediately; we would put it back a little after we get
going on some of these next phase implementation issues.
QUESTION: Are
the North Koreans looking for a non-aggression pact from the U.S.?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: Didn’t come up with us. Didn’t come up. And
I must say--
QUESTION: Would
you be willing to sign some sort of agreement like that?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: Any sort of non-aggression type issue, that’s what
the peace process is all about.
QUESTION: Are
you close to a date for ministerial talks?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: I think we are close, in that we keep eliminating dates
because people are busy doing other things. So we’re probably
going to get closer on that. But I don’t think we are going to
come away with a date during these next couple of days, because it
all involves us going back to our ministers’ schedulers and
figuring out how we can get six people around the table on the same
day in the same place. Not a lot of fun to try and harmonize those
schedules.
QUESTION: Do
you expect the Chairman’s statement before dinner tomorrow or
after?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: I don’t know. I expect things to go smoothly.
Probably before dinner, that’s my guess. Why don’t you
ask the Chinese that?
QUESTION: In
this process, when and how do you expect questions on the inspection
and verification --
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: That is a very important issue. Of course inspections, in
the first phase we already have IAEA doing inspecting and monitoring.
Inspecting is probably a bad word; it’s more verifying and
monitoring. So as we go to something like full declaration, we need
to make sure that is the right declaration. So that is going to
present itself pretty quickly. I think everyone understands that.
And, again, that is something for the denuclearization working group
to work on.
QUESTION: I
take it that all those issues have to be folded into the declaration?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: Yes, if you are doing a declaration you have to have some
means by which to verify, to monitor it, verify what’s in it.
Those sorts of issues will come up very soon.
QUESTION:
You’ve had bilats with the North Koreans and preliminary talks
today. Are you more confident than you were before leaving the U.S.
that you got some second phase done, or is it mostly -- ?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: Every time I say the slightest thing that suggests I’m
not in pure pain, I’m told I’m being optimistic. This is
a very tough negotiation, and it involves very important issues. All
I can say is we do have a pretty good framework. I think we have a
very good agenda. I believe we’re making progress on this.
But I’m very mindful of the fact that every time we go to a
next stage, you will come into further complications. And bumps in
the road can turn out to be very difficult to overcome.
But we do have a very
good process here, and I think it can sustain some of these difficult
moments. I think we can get through this. But I hate to say I’m
optimistic or whatever. It’s really not relevant. I’m
just trying to solve problems, frankly, and sometimes problems take
longer to solve than other problems.
QUESTION: Is
there anything special about the (inaudible)?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: No, we didn’t get through (inaudible).
QUESTION: Mr.
Hill, did you talk about your energy working group?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: I did.
QUESTION: And
your denuclearization?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: No, it’s just one those elements we raise all the
time. It’s part of the issue of the declaration, because we
can’t have a declaration that’s partial.
QUESTION: Is
there anything other than fuel oil?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: Well, what they’ve said is that they understand
there’s an absorption capacity problem on fuel oil that is some
50,000 tons a month. The February agreement anticipates that problem
by referring to equivalents, and so there was some discussion about
what might be an equivalent rather than just fuel oil. So there was
a bit of a discussion about that, but I want to emphasize that’s
not for a bunch of ambassadors to sit around talking about. That’s
for a bunch people in an energy working group to talk about.
All right?
QUESTION: So
what’s your day going to be tomorrow morning? You’re
going to be here around 7:00, 8:00, 9:00? What time should we be
here? (Laughter)
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: We have a 10 o’clock, so maybe you can talk to
someone from the Embassy about it. But I don’t think I would
leave here before 8:30 -- unless I leave here before 8:30.
(Laughter)
So, anyway, I could see
you about that time.
QUESTION: How
do you describe the attitude of the North Koreans, other than
business-like, in this round of talks?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: What’s wrong with business-like? You’ve used
that too many times?
QUESTION: No,
it’s a good word. But would you say that their attitudes have
been in any way different from previous rounds of talks?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HILL: It’s always dangerous to answer the last question.
But I would say that, as we went around the table, every single
delegation spoke to the issues that were on the table. Every
delegation spoke to what we’re talking about, and there were no
broader irrelevant themes that were brought up. Everything spoke
directly to the issues that we need to address. So, with that in
mind, I would call it very business-like.
All right, see you
later.
# # #